Hors d’œuvre

EVR Budapest EVR Corée EVR New York

EVR Corée

retour/back  Version imprimable de cet article Imprimer / Print

(institution to be completed)

Julieta Aranda/Anton Vidokle

short bio
version française


As we prepare to start EVR (e-flux video rental), we have been talking a lot about circulation and archives. We are discussing the social poetics of circulation, and the possibility of circulation as a crucial aesthetic act, with an agency independent to that of being merely the invisible enabler within the production / consumption cycle.

At its origins, the distribution of video is contingent on the fact that video is an infinitely reproducible medium. This poses a threat to the traditional relationship of equivalence where the artwork = a unique object, and it is because of this threat that at the moment in which works on video become accepted as high art and enter both private and public collections, they automatically become inaccessible to the general audience, as they are lifted to the rarified space of specific gallery and museum exhibitions. As the actual works become unavailable, they become replaced by a still image, which is a poor and inaccurate representation for a time-based media.

We are compelled to work with video because of the obvious contradictions in its circulation mechanisms. EVR is meant to be a free video rental store, that operates as an intersection between an archive, a screening room and a structure for the circulation of video and film artworks outside of the traditional exhibition spaces.

Drawing the policies that will regulate the EVR project, we are trying to make a distinction between open circulation and endless availability. The main purpose of the project is not to provide infinite access to the material, but rather to use the potential of the archive to activate and engage an audience. A way to turn accumulation into action.

EVR will function on the principle of borrowing, where every step of the transaction necessary to take out a tape represents a process of implication, a transfer of responsibility. Every time a video work leaves the space, the borrower becomes temporarily responsible for the conditions of its display, and the narrativisation of the space in which the display takes place. We all participate in a temporary collusion that intends to blur the distinction between artist, curator, and spectator.


a) As we prepare the last incarnations of EVR, I am constantly thinking about the structural nature of the project, and what we originally set out to do with it. While we were relying to an extent in an institutional model for the structure of the EVR, we never meant to create an institution for the archiving and circulating of film and video artworks, but rather to replace this institution with its own exploration : We wanted to propose a transfer of subjectivation and responsibility, so as to render the sphere of effect of an artwork dependent on the collective imagination, rather than on the architecture of any particular building.

b) Referring to circulation as a mode of completion and as a possibility for social agency, reminds me of a recent interview between Mary Kelly and Ian White where Mary Kelly says “I think whom you desire to speak to at an unconscious level is very significant, because if your work no longer has any collective imaginary, then there is the end of public art.”

c) All that is solid melts into air ! [1]. We were relying on a XX century technological support (VHS tapes) which was in the process of dying when we started the EVR project in 2004, so by now this technology has finally become complete obsolete. In the 4 years interval punctuated by EVR, the specific materiality of production has become less significant, so the conditions for our temporary exercise in material re-distribution are being replaced by an endless virtual availability. This is not good, nor bad. It is too soon to tell the full effect of this, so we shouldn’t rush to judgment in response to either progressive illusions or nostalgic pessimism. The only thing that is sure, is that this is a new configuration of information, for which new conditions of activation have to be determined.

Biographies :

Julieta Aranda (1975)
Born in Mexico City, currently lives and works between Berlin and New York. She received her MFA in 2006 from Columbia University, (NY), and her BFA on filmmaking on 2001, from the School of Visual Arts, (NY). Together with Anton Vidokle, Julieta Aranda put together Pawnshop ; and e-flux video rental, which started in the e-flux storefront in new York, and has traveled to São Paulo, Brasil (2008), Fundaçao Gulbenkian, Lisbon, Portugal (2008) ; 10th Lyon Biennial, France (2007) ; Centre Culturel Suisse de Paris, France (2007) ; Carpenter Center at Harvard University, Boston, MA (2007), PIST, Istanbul, Turkey (2006) ; Arthouse, Austin, TX (2006) ; 1st Bienal de Canarias, Arquitectura, Arte y Paisaje, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain (2006), Museum of Modern Art, Budapest, Hungary (2006) ; Extra City, Antwerp, Belgium (2006) ; INSA Art Space, Seoul, Korea (2005) ; Portikus, Frankfurt, Germany (2005) ; Kunstwerke Institute for Contemporary Art, Berlin, Germany (2005) ; and Moore Space, Miami, FL (2005).

Anton Vidokle was born in Moscow and arrived to the US with his parents in 1981, settling on Broome Street on the Lower East Side. His work has been exhibited in shows such as the Venice Biennale, Lyon Biennial, Dakar Biennale, Lodz Biennale, and at Tate Modern, London ; Moderna Galerija, Ljubljana ; Musée d’art Modern de la Ville de Paris ; Museo Carrillo Gil, Mexico City ; UCLA Hammer, LA ; ICA, Boston ; Haus Der Kunst, Munich ; P.S.1, New York ; among others. With Julieta Aranda, he organized e-flux video rental, which traveled to numerous institutions including Portikus, Frankfurt ; KunstWerk, Berlin ; Extra City, Antwerp ; Carpenter Center, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA ; and others. As founding director of e-flux, he has produced projects such as Next Documenta Should Be Curated By An Artist, Do it, Utopia Station poster project, and organized An Image Bank for Everyday Revolutionary Life and Martha Rosler Library. Vidokle initiated research into education as site for artistic practice as co-curator for Manifesta 6, which was canceled. In response to the cancellation, Vidokle set up an independent project in Berlin called Unitednationsplaza—a twelve-month project involving more than a hundred artists, writers, philosophers, and diverse audiences. Located behind a supermarket in East Berlin, UNP’s program featured numerous seminars, lectures, screenings, book presentations and projects including the Martha Rosler Library.

version française (PDF)

[1] Marx and Engels, The Communist Manifesto